It is a good practice for employers to have employees sign a full and final release when their employment is terminated in order to avoid future law suits arising from the employment relationship. Recent cases of the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario illustrate a trend in the jurisprudence toward dismissing human rights applications by employees who have signed a release. Read about these decisions and tips to make your release enforceable in our latest update
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Divisional Court Clarifies Test for a Poisonous Work Environment
When employees allege harassment in human rights complaints, they often refer to the creation of a “poisoned work environment.” A…
16 Jan 2015
Register Now for our Complimentary, Quarterly HR-Law Webinar
Register Now! As always, our goal is to provide a concise, high-level summary of the most significant legal developments affecting…
07 Jul 2014
Preferential Treatment for Employees with Active WSIB Claims not Discriminatory
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the “Tribunal”) recently held that it is not discriminatory for employers to treat disabled…
25 Oct 2017
Federal Court of Appeal Revises Test for Family Status Discrimination
In another twist in the rapidly developing area of family status discrimination law, the Federal Court of Appeal recently released…
20 May 2014
Shift-Shopping Endorsement Upheld by Alberta Court
The Alberta Court of Queen’s bench recently reviewed the arbitrator’s decision in SMS Equipment, a case on which we have written before (see…
31 Mar 2015
A New Way to Deal with Frivolous Human Rights Complaints Quickly and Cost Effectively
Among the amendments to Ontario’s human rights system in the past few years was the creation of a summary hearings…
19 Oct 2011
Divisional Court provides Guidance as to What Constitutes a Prima Facie Case of Discrimination
In a recent case, Peel Law Association v. Pieters, the Divisional Court overturned a decision of the Human Rights Tribunal finding…
06 Mar 2012
Navigating the Attendance Management Minefield in the COVID era
On September 4, 2020, Ryan and Jeremy discussed the legal tightrope in terms of employee attendance management, that employers must…
04 Sep 2020
Random Drug Testing Debate – National Perspective?
In April, we blogged that the Supreme Court of Canada had granted leave to appeal a decision regarding the random alcohol testing…
16 Oct 2012
Gloves Come Off: Sky High Damages in Human Rights Cases
By: Ryan Conlin and Frank Portman Human Rights Tribunals across the country have been issuing damage awards which have raised…
05 Jun 2014
Hypothetical Standards: Human Rights Tribunal finds Police Liable for Racism – Jeremy Schwartz
Hypothetical Standards: Human Rights Tribunal finds Police Liable for Racism – Jeremy Schwartz
23 Dec 2009
Ryan Conlin speaks to CBC Radio
“A Lawyer’s Perspective on Pot in the Workplace” – Ryan Conlin speaks to CBC Radio on Here and Now Toronto
02 May 2018
Think You Suffered Family Status Discrimination? First Things First – Were You Employed in Ontario or B.C.?
The law governing family status discrimination under human rights legislation is unsettled and varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. A new…
16 Apr 2019
Then Now Next: Ontario Government To Introduce Pay Transparency Legislation
Premier Kathleen Wynne announced this morning that the Ontario government would introduce new legislation aimed at increasing pay transparency as…
06 Mar 2018
The Human Rights Tribunal Says No to Forum Shopping
It has been a year since the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola (“Figliola”). In…
08 Nov 2012