It is a good practice for employers to have employees sign a full and final release when their employment is terminated in order to avoid future law suits arising from the employment relationship. Recent cases of the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario illustrate a trend in the jurisprudence toward dismissing human rights applications by employees who have signed a release. Read about these decisions and tips to make your release enforceable in our latest update
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Human Rights Tribunal Rules on Family Status Protection for Infrequent and Unexpected Childcare Obligations
A recent Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario decision confirms that family status protection may require employers to accommodate employees’ sporadic…
20 Apr 2016
Alberta Human Rights Tribunal Awards Employee $650,000
After 19 years of protracted litigation, the Human Rights Tribunal of Alberta has now awarded a former employee of Mobil…
09 Sep 2010
What mental capacity is required to sign a release?
In a past Stringer Update, Releases Protect Employers from Human Rights Complaints, we emphasized the importance of having terminated employees sign…
11 Oct 2012
Holiday Webinar 3: Harassment
Jeremy Schwartz discusses how to avoid and address workplace sexual harassment.
21 Dec 2016
Preferential Treatment for Employees with Active WSIB Claims not Discriminatory
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the “Tribunal”) recently held that it is not discriminatory for employers to treat disabled…
25 Oct 2017
Embracing the #MeToo Movement
#MeToo has quickly caught wind as a widespread movement that sheds light on the prevalence of sexual assault and harassment,…
18 Sep 2019
Human Rights Tribunal Heeding Clear Direction from Supreme Court
In British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola, a decision released in October 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada found that…
25 Jan 2012
Fail to Plan? Plan to Fail. Pandemic Planning and Response for HR
The World Health Organization has declared COVID-19 a global pandemic. Not since H1N1 and SARS before that, have employers faced…
27 Mar 2020
WSIB RETURN TO WORK DECISIONS: ARE THEY BINDING ON THE HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL?
The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human…
14 Sep 2010
What does “Disability” Actually Mean for Accommodation Purposes?
The law is clear that an employer is required to accommodate employees with a “disability” up to the point of…
22 May 2013
2020 – An HR Law Year in Review
In 2020, employers were faced with unprecedented legal challenges brought on by the pandemic. Meanwhile, the courts and tribunals issued…
15 Jan 2021
Supreme Court Allows Employees to “Double-Up” on Pregnancy and Parental Benefits
Supreme Court Allows Employees to “Double-Up” on Pregnancy and Parental Benefits A regular point of contention between unions and employers…
08 Dec 2014
Is the Sky Falling? Family Status Discrimination and Shift Shopping
By: Ryan Conlin & Frank Portman In most jurisdictions in Canada, human rights legislation prohibits discrimination on the basis of…
07 Mar 2014
Federal Court of Appeal Revises Test for Family Status Discrimination
In another twist in the rapidly developing area of family status discrimination law, the Federal Court of Appeal recently released…
20 May 2014
2014 Q2 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 4: FCA Establishes New Family Status Test
Allison Taylor discusses the recent Federal Court of Appeal decision which outlined a new, balanced test for family status discrimination…
23 Jul 2014