Employers who only provide the minimum amounts required by employment standards legislation after termination are gambling. Sometimes this approach can result in cost savings, but it can also end in a costly damages and legal costs award as occurred in the case of Brito v. Canac Kitchens. Read our Latest Update for more information about the case, and what to do to protect your organization from such awards.
Related Posts
Employers are often told by their lawyers that satisfying a Court that there is “just cause” to terminate an employee…
Suspensions are an important disciplinary measure for employers, often bridging the gap between less significant discipline and termination. However, in…
Employers be warned – engaging in high-handed, bullying behaviour when dismissing an employee may be a costly strategy. The Supreme…
When is an owner also an “employee”? The Supreme Court of Canada recently rendered a decision on the question of…
During this edition of Stringer LLP’s complimentary Quarterly HR-Law Webinar series, broadcast on Monday, January 20, 2020, Ryan Conlin, Jeremy Schwartz and Erika Montisano discussed…
Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice recently struck down a release signed at a termination meeting. Read more about this interesting…
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently ruled in Bowes v. Goss Power Products Ltd., that a fairly standard termination provision…
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Frank Portman A recent French language decision from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice indicates that…
The Ontario Court of Appeal has released its concise decision in Brito v. Canac Kitchens, in which the court upheld a…
The Ontario government introduced Bill 66, Restoring Ontario’s Competitiveness Act, 2018 on December 6, 2018. Bill 66 passed First Reading, and is…
Perhaps now more than ever before, the lawyers at Stringer LLP have been deeply engaged, supporting clients who face significant,…
By: Jeremy D. Schwartz, Ryan J. Conlin and Erika M. Montisano Most of Ontario’s public health units are now well…
To be enforceable, non-competition agreements must, as a general rule, be reasonable and unambiguous in terms of their geographic scope,…
Continuing to Work Following Changes to Employment Not Considered Acceptance of Changes – Joe Morrison
Don’t Forget to Consider “Consideration” – Jeremy Schwartz

