Employers who only provide the minimum amounts required by employment standards legislation after termination are gambling. Sometimes this approach can result in cost savings, but it can also end in a costly damages and legal costs award as occurred in the case of Brito v. Canac Kitchens. Read our Latest Update for more information about the case, and what to do to protect your organization from such awards.
Related Posts
Anyone involved in the human resources side of management will be familiar with the concept of notice periods for terminated…
In a recent decision, the Alberta Court of Appeal strongly affirmed employers’ right to terminate employees without cause, and without…
The Ontario Court of Appeal recently denied entitlement to bonus payout to an employee who quit his job. The Court…
Landon Young discusses a recent wrongful dismissal class action lawsuit and the potential impact on employment litigation
Employers are often told by their lawyers that satisfying a Court that there is “just cause” to terminate an employee…
The Ontario Superior Court has ruled that an employee who continued to work for 15 months following a change in…
Ryan Conlin and Frank Portman discuss the disturbing trend of increasingly large general damages awards in human rights litigation.
Frank discusses how to best ensure you may rely on disciplinary records to prove just cause
Jeremy Schwartz discusses recent punitive damages awards in Ontario
Bill 30, An Act to Amend the Employment Standards Act, 2000 in respect of family caregiver leave, went through its second…
By: Landon Young There have been a number of cases in recent years considering whether dismissed employees are entitled to awards…
Perhaps now more than ever before, the lawyers at Stringer LLP have been deeply engaged, supporting clients who face significant,…
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Daniel Gaspar On October 2, 2020, Federal Bill C-4, An Act relating to certain measures in response…
Jeff Murray discusses social host liability for employers.
Jessica Young explains the inherent risks associated with “encouraging” employees to retire.