Employers who only provide the minimum amounts required by employment standards legislation after termination are gambling. Sometimes this approach can result in cost savings, but it can also end in a costly damages and legal costs award as occurred in the case of Brito v. Canac Kitchens. Read our Latest Update for more information about the case, and what to do to protect your organization from such awards.
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Jurisdictional disputes in employment contracts
In this electronic age, many employers will make offers of employment via email. When the offer is being made to…
06 Mar 2014
Specific Termination Provision Upheld After Sale of Business
When a company purchases another business, it is important to consider the legal implications respecting the status of employees. The…
08 May 2013
British Columbia Court of Appeal Overturns Lower Court Decision on Profit Sharing Plan
Employers that decide to implement a profit sharing plan for employees should make sure that the terms of the plan…
14 Feb 2014
Allison Taylor to present OBA webinar: Pregnant Employees: The Risks of Reproduction
Allison Taylor will present this insightful webinar for the Ontario Bar Association on March 12. She will discuss related issues including leaves…
20 Feb 2015
COVID-19: Lessons from the HR Trenches
Perhaps now more than ever before, the lawyers at Stringer LLP have been deeply engaged, supporting clients who face significant,…
30 Jul 2020
Supreme Court of Canada Rules in Favour of Postal Workers in Pay Equity Human Rights Decision
The claim was filed 28 years ago by female employees of Canada Post with the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (the…
21 Nov 2011
Superior Court Confirms that Employers can Fundamentally Change Employment Contracts with Reasonable Notice
In Lancia v. Park Dentistry, the Ontario Superior Court confirmed that employers can change the fundamental terms of an employee’s employment,…
11 Jul 2018
Court Limits Bonus Entitlement During Notice Period
An often-contentious issue in wrongful dismissal litigation is whether an employee is entitled to a bonus that accrues or would…
22 Sep 2017
Holiday Webinar 4: Employee Discipline
Allison Taylor discusses progressive discipline and termination for employee misconduct.
21 Dec 2016
Court finds employee did not condone changes after 15 months
The Ontario Superior Court has ruled that an employee who continued to work for 15 months following a change in…
12 Apr 2011
2013 Q3 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 2: Summary Judgement
This is segment 2 of 5 from our Q3 webinar held on Thursday, October 10, “Recent Developments in Summary Judgement Motions”
12 Oct 2013
Off-Duty Drunk Driving Not Just Cause for Termination – Even for a Firefighter
In Klonteig v West Kelowna (District), the British Columbia Superior Court found that an employer that terminated a firefighter for driving…
27 Jun 2018
Personal Liability in Wrongful Dismissal Actions
A recent decision of the Divisional Court raises the issue of when an individual can be found personally liable in…
31 Jan 2014
Court of Appeal Protects Manager from Personal Liability on Employee Termination
A well-drafted contract protects not only the company but also its employees and senior personnel. In a recent decision, Richards v….
09 Jan 2013
Mitigation – A duty to act in your own professional interest
When no work is available in a particular field, dismissed employees may undertake reasonable mitigation efforts by pursuing re-training to…
30 Dec 2016