Frank Portman discusses a recent case in which the Ontario Court of Appeal reversed a trial decision and substituted a finding of just cause.
Related Posts
A recent decision by the British Columbia Court of Appeal highlights the importance of carefully crafting written employment agreements whenever shares are…
The AODA Employment Standard deadlines are not as far away as they may seem. The Employment Standard is one of…
The Ontario Superior Court recently awarded four months of pay in lieu of reasonable notice to an employee with less…
In a recent blog, we discussed the trend toward the use of summary judgement motions to resolve wrongful dismissal actions. By…
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Amanda Boyce In-house counsel is often the unsung hero of a legal saga, having guided their…
While employee theft is frequently grounds for termination, shades of grey do appear in the case law. In a recent…
The calendar has now changed over to 2015, and with the New Year comes an interesting legal situation for certain…
The Divisional Court recently upheld a trial decision finding that an employer did not defame a former employee when it…
Many employers prepare written employment agreements that limit employee entitlements on termination of employment. In the absence of an enforceable…
By: Landon Young There have been a number of cases in recent years considering whether dismissed employees are entitled to awards…
As work patterns change in the modern era, the line between independent contractor and employee can often become blurry. A…
By: Jeremy Schwartz Some organizations subscribe to the close your eyes and think good thoughts school of drafting, when it comes to…
The Ontario Court of Appeal recently denied entitlement to bonus payout to an employee who quit his job. The Court…
The government of Quebec has recently introduced new incentives for businesses to promote work-life balance, through its “work-family balance certification”…
When is a single, serious instance of misconduct just cause for termination, particularly for a long-service employee? In Fernandes v. Peel…