Ryan Conlin discusses the potentially watershed decision in R. v. Roofing Medics, in which the court commented that more personal defendants in health and safety prosecutions should face jail sentences.
Related Posts
Ryan Conlin summarizes and comments upon the significant amendments Bill 18 has effected to Ontario’s Employment Standards Act, Workplace Safety…
A recent decision, R v The Corporation of the City of Guelph et al.[1] provides a narrow interpretation of limitation periods in…
Employers are often told by their lawyers that satisfying a Court that there is “just cause” to terminate an employee…
Don’t Miss our 26th Annual Employers’ Conference, Labour & Employment Law Update 2012. Register Early! Topics Include: A Terminated Employee’s…
The saga of Ontario (Ministry of Labour) v. JR Contracting Property Services, Lootawan and Haniff (case 1) has finally come to its…
Ryan Conlin A recent sentencing decision involving the owner of a small roofing company suggests that the Courts may be…
<p> Ryan Conlin and Landon Young both spoke at the first annual Health, Safety & Environment Conference and Trade Show…
It may seem fairly obvious when a worker breaks her leg “in the course of employment”. However, injuries and illnesses…
A critical element of the health and safety regime in any workplace that employs heavy machinery is the presence of…
By: Ryan Conlin and Frank Portman The tragic Christmas Eve 2009 swing stage collapse which led to the deaths of four…
Jeremy Schwartz discusses the disturbing trend of employees forum shopping in human rights matters, and a recent HRTO decision which…
By: Ryan Conlin & Frank Portman From time to time judges comment and decide on matters affecting employment law in…
The tragic deaths of four workers at a Toronto construction site on December 24, 2009 quickly became one of the…
Corporate employers who are faced with charges under the Occupational Health and Safety Act or other legislation occupy a curious position when…
The Ontario Court of Appeal has made it clear in a recent decision that it is illegal to hold a cellular phone…