The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human Rights Code remedies against their employer even if the WSIB has ruled in the employer’s favour with respect to whether work is suitable
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Brave New Workplace: The Legalization of Recreational Marijuana in Canada
The legalization of marijuana for recreational use will have a profound impact on workplaces across the country. This Webinar examines…
17 Oct 2018
Responding to human rights harassment complaints: Guidelines from the HRTO
You are an employer that has just received a harassment complaint from an employee. The complaint is against a valued…
28 Mar 2013
Significant OHSA Amendments Slated for 2022
Date: Mar 28. 2022 The Ontario Government has proposed significant legislative changes that may impact how accident investigations and enforcement…
28 Mar 2022
Zero Tolerance Policies and Medicinal Marijuana
Marijuana will soon be legal for recreational use nationwide and many employers are scrambling to respond to the challenges this…
28 Sep 2018
The Latest on Forum Shopping: The Human Rights Tribunal is Considering Whether a WSIB Case Manager Decision is a “Proceedingâ€
As readers of our Blog and recent update are aware, the blockbuster Supreme Court decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola,…
21 Feb 2012
Preferential Treatment for Employees with Active WSIB Claims not Discriminatory
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the “Tribunal”) recently held that it is not discriminatory for employers to treat disabled…
25 Oct 2017
BC Labour Relations Board waters down Irving Pulp
Employers are still wrestling with the consequences of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision on the random drug and alcohol testing…
26 May 2014
Shift-Shopping Endorsement Upheld by Alberta Court
The Alberta Court of Queen’s bench recently reviewed the arbitrator’s decision in SMS Equipment, a case on which we have written before (see…
31 Mar 2015
Early Bird Registration Now Open: 16th Annual Employment Law Conference
Stringer LLP and First Reference are proud to host the 16th Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference in Mississauga. We invite business owners and…
03 Mar 2015
Supreme Court Allows Employees to “Double-Up” on Pregnancy and Parental Benefits
Supreme Court Allows Employees to “Double-Up” on Pregnancy and Parental Benefits A regular point of contention between unions and employers…
08 Dec 2014
2014 Q4 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 4: Human Rights Forum Shopping
Jeremy Schwartz discusses the disturbing trend of employees forum shopping in human rights matters, and a recent HRTO decision which…
21 Jan 2015
Discrimination Case Reversed by the Courts: Are we Entering a New Era? – Allison Taylor
Discrimination Case Reversed by the Courts: Are we Entering a New Era? – Allison Taylor
14 Mar 2011
Human Rights Tribunal finds undue hardship test met
In a recent application to the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, the Tribunal found that an employer facing an economic…
17 Oct 2011
Hypothetical Standards: Human Rights Tribunal finds Police Liable for Racism – Jeremy Schwartz
Hypothetical Standards: Human Rights Tribunal finds Police Liable for Racism – Jeremy Schwartz
23 Dec 2009
Ontario Human Rights Tribunal Opening the Door to Duplicative Litigation?
Since the Supreme Court decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola (“Figliola”), the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the…
11 Sep 2013