The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human Rights Code remedies against their employer even if the WSIB has ruled in the employer’s favour with respect to whether work is suitable
Related Posts
In 2020, employers were faced with unprecedented legal challenges brought on by the pandemic. Meanwhile, the courts and tribunals issued…
As we have noted in previous updates, the size of general damages awarded by human rights tribunals has trended sharply…
The law on addiction has evolved over the years in arbitral jurisprudence. Earlier decisions treated illness as a mitigating factor…
In the wake of the Divisional Court’s decision in the Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board v Fair, human rights damages have been…
In a past Stringer Update, Releases Protect Employers from Human Rights Complaints, we emphasized the importance of having terminated employees sign…
A recent Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario decision confirms that family status protection may require employers to accommodate employees’ sporadic…
It is a good practice for employers to have employees sign a full and final release when their employment is…
By: Ryan Conlin & Frank Portman In most jurisdictions in Canada, human rights legislation prohibits discrimination on the basis of…
In this webinar, Ryan Conlin and Landon Young provided guidance for employers on how to respond to the legal challenges…
As readers of our Blog and recent update are aware, the blockbuster Supreme Court decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola,…
The legalization of marijuana for recreational use will have a profound impact on workplaces across the country. This Webinar examines…
Discrimination Case Reversed by the Courts: Are we Entering a New Era? – Allison Taylor
Employers have made their plans; they’ve hunkered down; and they’ve sheltered in place. As we traverse the long and winding…
Supreme Court Allows Employees to “Double-Up” on Pregnancy and Parental Benefits A regular point of contention between unions and employers…
The law is clear that an employer is required to accommodate employees with a “disability” up to the point of…