The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human Rights Code remedies against their employer even if the WSIB has ruled in the employer’s favour with respect to whether work is suitable
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Register Now for our Complimentary, Quarterly HR-Law Webinar
Register Now! As always, our goal is to provide a concise, high-level summary of the most significant legal developments affecting…
07 Jul 2014
Navigating the Attendance Management Minefield in the COVID era
On September 4, 2020, Ryan and Jeremy discussed the legal tightrope in terms of employee attendance management, that employers must…
04 Sep 2020
Releases Protect Employers from Human Rights Complaints – Landon Young and Jessica Young
Releases Protect Employers from Human Rights Complaints – Landon Young and Jessica Young
12 Aug 2011
Federal Court of Appeal Revises Test for Family Status Discrimination
In another twist in the rapidly developing area of family status discrimination law, the Federal Court of Appeal recently released…
20 May 2014
Think You Suffered Family Status Discrimination? First Things First – Were You Employed in Ontario or B.C.?
The law governing family status discrimination under human rights legislation is unsettled and varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. A new…
16 Apr 2019
2014 Q3 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 1: WSIB Return to Work
Ryan Conlin discusses recent changes to the WSIB return to work
14 Oct 2014
Does Human Rights Legislation Apply to Job Ads on Facebook?
Technological advancements frequently outpace the law’s ability to respond to the challenges they create. With the click of a button,…
12 Apr 2019
Office Holiday Parties – The Fine Print
An office holiday party is a great time to unwind as a team and encourage a sense of community. Unfortunately,…
14 Dec 2012
Fail to Plan? Plan to Fail. Pandemic Planning and Response for HR
The World Health Organization has declared COVID-19 a global pandemic. Not since H1N1 and SARS before that, have employers faced…
27 Mar 2020
Addiction without compulsion: no defence to serious misconduct using the “hybrid” approach
The law on addiction has evolved over the years in arbitral jurisprudence. Earlier decisions treated illness as a mitigating factor…
03 Mar 2017
Significant Changes to the Human Rights Tribunal’s Rules
Kelly McDermott and Jeremy Schwartz Effective July 1, 2010, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has made significant changes to…
15 Jul 2010
Human Rights Tribunal Discourages Unnecessary Naming of Personal Respondents in Applications
In Sterling v Wendy’s Restaurant, the applicants (a former Wendy’s employee and his wife), named 14 personal respondents, who were members…
07 Sep 2011
What mental capacity is required to sign a release?
In a past Stringer Update, Releases Protect Employers from Human Rights Complaints, we emphasized the importance of having terminated employees sign…
11 Oct 2012
Ontario Human Rights Tribunal Opening the Door to Duplicative Litigation?
Since the Supreme Court decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola (“Figliola”), the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the…
11 Sep 2013
Stress Claim Tsunami: New Approach to WSIB Stress Claims
Ryan Conlin and Jeremy Schwartz discuss a landmark WSIAT decision which held sections of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act…
29 May 2014