In a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, the Court dealt with the issue of awarding legal costs in a human rights complaint. This decision provides a good reminder to employers and employees of the significance of legal costs in such proceedings. Read about this decision and the practical implications in our Latest Update.
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin
WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin
14 Sep 2010
Divisional Court provides Guidance as to What Constitutes a Prima Facie Case of Discrimination
In a recent case, Peel Law Association v. Pieters, the Divisional Court overturned a decision of the Human Rights Tribunal finding…
06 Mar 2012
Ryan Conlin speaks to CBC Radio
“A Lawyer’s Perspective on Pot in the Workplace” – Ryan Conlin speaks to CBC Radio on Here and Now Toronto
02 May 2018
Is the Sky Falling? Family Status Discrimination and Shift Shopping
By: Ryan Conlin & Frank Portman In most jurisdictions in Canada, human rights legislation prohibits discrimination on the basis of…
07 Mar 2014
Navigating the Attendance Management Minefield in the COVID era
On September 4, 2020, Ryan and Jeremy discussed the legal tightrope in terms of employee attendance management, that employers must…
04 Sep 2020
Ontario’s Court of Appeal Quashes Termination After Medical Note Received One Day Late – Jeremy Schwartz
By: Jeremy Schwartz The Ontario Court of Appeal (ONCA) has quashed an arbitration award which upheld a just cause termination. …
14 Aug 2012
COVID-19: Lessons from the HR Trenches
Perhaps now more than ever before, the lawyers at Stringer LLP have been deeply engaged, supporting clients who face significant,…
30 Jul 2020
When is an Owner an Employee?
When is an owner also an “employee”? The Supreme Court of Canada recently rendered a decision on the question of…
24 Jun 2014
WSIB RETURN TO WORK DECISIONS: ARE THEY BINDING ON THE HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL?
The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human…
14 Sep 2010
What you Need to Know About the New Voluntary Workplace Mental Health Standard
The Psychological Health and Safety in the Workplace – Prevention, promotion and guidance to staged implementation (the “Standard”) was released by the…
04 Jun 2013
Federal Court of Appeal Revises Test for Family Status Discrimination
In another twist in the rapidly developing area of family status discrimination law, the Federal Court of Appeal recently released…
20 May 2014
Shift-Shopping Endorsement Upheld by Alberta Court
The Alberta Court of Queen’s bench recently reviewed the arbitrator’s decision in SMS Equipment, a case on which we have written before (see…
31 Mar 2015
Early Bird Registration Now Open: 16th Annual Employment Law Conference
Stringer LLP and First Reference are proud to host the 16th Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference in Mississauga. We invite business owners and…
03 Mar 2015
Court Comments on when Employers can ask for an Independent Medical Examination
Ontario’s Divisional Court recently confirmed that employers have a right to ask employees to undergo an Independent Medical Examination (“IME”)…
16 Aug 2017
Vaccine Mandates: The Courts and Arbitrators are Weighing In
Date: Dec 06, 2021 Vaccine mandates have been legally and politically controversial in Canada and around the world. We are…
06 Dec 2021