In a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, the Court dealt with the issue of awarding legal costs in a human rights complaint. This decision provides a good reminder to employers and employees of the significance of legal costs in such proceedings. Read about this decision and the practical implications in our Latest Update.
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin
WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin
14 Sep 2010
Holiday Webinar 5: Religious Accommodation
Amanda Boyce discusses accommodation obligations for non-Christian observers.
21 Dec 2016
Allison Taylor Speaks to Canadian @HRReporter About Managing Disabled Employees
Tweet This Post Posted on Wednesday, July 6th, 2011 at 11:24 am Categories: Uncategorized.
16 Jul 2011
Alphabet Soup – Navigating the Waters of SUBs, CERBS, Layoffs, Work-Sharing and Subsidies in the Corona Virus Emergency
Canadian employers have been confronted with a veritable ocean of new government programs, which are designed to help weather the…
16 Apr 2020
Divisional Court Clarifies Test for a Poisonous Work Environment
When employees allege harassment in human rights complaints, they often refer to the creation of a “poisoned work environment.” A…
16 Jan 2015
Ontario Human Rights Tribunal Opening the Door to Duplicative Litigation?
Since the Supreme Court decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola (“Figliola”), the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the…
11 Sep 2013
When is an Owner an Employee?
When is an owner also an “employee”? The Supreme Court of Canada recently rendered a decision on the question of…
24 Jun 2014
Brave New Workplace: The Legalization of Recreational Marijuana in Canada
The legalization of marijuana for recreational use will have a profound impact on workplaces across the country. This Webinar examines…
17 Oct 2018
2015 Q1 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 2: Retirement and Terminations
Jessica Young explains the inherent risks associated with “encouraging” employees to retire.
21 Apr 2015
WSIB RETURN TO WORK DECISIONS: ARE THEY BINDING ON THE HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL?
The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human…
14 Sep 2010
Deal or No Deal?
Contracts of all kinds often fall apart over relatively minor details, despite the parties’ agreement on the majority of issues. …
26 Jun 2014
2014 Q1 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 1: Alcohol & Drug Testing Update
Ryan Conlin of Stringer LLP discusses recent jurisprudence concerning random drug and alcohol testing in Canada (post-Irving).
22 Apr 2014
Significant OHSA Amendments Slated for 2022
Date: Mar 28. 2022 The Ontario Government has proposed significant legislative changes that may impact how accident investigations and enforcement…
28 Mar 2022
Double the Previous Record Awarded in Damages for Sexual Harassment
As we have noted in previous updates, the size of general damages awarded by human rights tribunals has trended sharply…
15 Jun 2015
What is the next step in AODA compliance?
The AODA Employment Standard deadlines are not as far away as they may seem. The Employment Standard is one of…
26 May 2014