Frank Portman discusses a recent, significant decision from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario concerning remedies and mental illness in the workplace.
Related Posts
Contracts of all kinds often fall apart over relatively minor details, despite the parties’ agreement on the majority of issues. …
Employers are often unsure whether they have the right to ask for doctor’s notes (i.e. medical evidence) to justify employee…
Don’t Miss our 27th Annual Employers’ Conference: Labour & Employment Law Update 2013. Space is limited. Register Early! Topics Include:…
As we have noted in previous updates, the size of general damages awarded by human rights tribunals has trended sharply…
The law on addiction has evolved over the years in arbitral jurisprudence. Earlier decisions treated illness as a mitigating factor…
When employees allege harassment in human rights complaints, they often refer to the creation of a “poisoned work environment.” A…
Amanda Boyce discusses accommodation obligations for non-Christian observers.
Hypothetical Standards: Human Rights Tribunal finds Police Liable for Racism – Jeremy Schwartz
Discrimination Case Reversed by the Courts: Are we Entering a New Era? – Allison Taylor
Workplace investigations have been an increasingly important topic for HR Professionals in the past few years. Employers have a duty…
Alberta Human Rights Tribunal Awards Employee $650,000 – Kelly McDermott
Supreme Court Allows Employees to “Double-Up” on Pregnancy and Parental Benefits A regular point of contention between unions and employers…
In British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola, a decision released in October 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada found that…
Obese Resident Awarded Preferred Parking Space – Jeremy D. Schwartz
This is segment 1 of 5 from our Q3 webinar held on Thursday, October 10, “Upcoming AODA Obligations – What You Need…