Ryan Conlin discusses the potentially watershed decision in R. v. Roofing Medics, in which the court commented that more personal defendants in health and safety prosecutions should face jail sentences.
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Recent Update from the Minister of Labour on Bill 160
As we mentioned in our SBH Update, a significant change under Bill 160 is the removal of the Injury & Disease…
15 Aug 2011
Court of Appeal Overturns Blue Mountain Accident Reporting Decision – Ryan Conlin
By: Ryan J. Conlin Employers across Ontario are likely breathing a sigh of relief. The Court of Appeal just released…
08 Feb 2013
“Creative Sentencing” for Corporations Convicted of OH&S Offences Arrives in Ontario
By: Ryan Conlin and Jeremy Schwartz An Ontario Court may have altered the legal landscape with respect to sentencing corporations…
10 Feb 2020
Can a Defendant be Charged Criminally After Pleading Guilty to OHSA Charges?
One of the most interesting questions that arose after the Bill C-45 amendments to the Criminal Code, is whether a defendant…
25 Aug 2017
The Road Back Safety and Employment Law Considerations for Re Opening the Workplace
In this webinar, Ryan Conlin and Landon Young provided guidance for employers on how to respond to the legal challenges…
02 Jun 2020
Ontario Court of Appeal Overturns Blue Mountain Accident Reporting Decision
Employers across Ontario are likely breathing sigh of relief. The Court of Appeal just released its decision in Blue Mountain v….
08 Feb 2013
Proposed Amendments to the OHSA put Corporate Officers and Directors on Notice and May Imperil Charter Protections for all Defendants
By Ryan Conlin and Jeremy Schwartz The Ontario government has introduced the Working for Workers Act, 2022, which contains significant proposed…
07 Mar 2022
Appeal Court Rules That Contract is Critical to Determining the Identity of the Constructor
One of the most complex issues under Ontario OH&S law relates to determining which party on a construction project is…
31 Aug 2012
Discipline Warranted for Work Refusal Complaint Not Made in Good Faith
As part of the Bill 168 amendments to the Occupational Health and Safety Act (“OHSA”), workers can initiate a work refusal where…
30 Apr 2013
Appeal Court Expands Foreseeability Defence
An Ontario Court has released a significant appeal decision which is the latest a line of cases to challenge the traditional view that it is…
17 Dec 2012
Avoiding Substantial OH&S Liability when Hiring Contractors
By: Ryan Conlin & Jeremy Schwartz Hire a contractor and you may inadvertently face liability as a “constructor” under Ontario’s Occupational…
24 Feb 2012
Smoked Out: Employer Convicted When Employee Smokes in Truck
Do you have a policy prohibiting your employees from smoking when they drive alone in a company vehicle? If not,…
28 Jul 2017
Strong Safety Program Protects Constructor Despite Subcontractor’s Guilty Plea
Constructors, including many owners who directly hire and oversee contractors on their properties, must have strong and meaningful safety programs in…
31 Jul 2014
OLRB rules on electrician exemption in construction regulation
The Ontario Labour Relations Board (OLRB) has ruled that a worker does not have to be a certified or apprentice…
23 Apr 2012
2014 Q4 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 2: Bill 18
Ryan Conlin summarizes and comments upon the significant amendments Bill 18 has effected to Ontario’s Employment Standards Act, Workplace Safety…
21 Jan 2015