Frank Portman discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision which greatly increased the scope of general and other damages awarded in a wrongful dismissal action.
Related Posts
Many employers prepare written employment agreements that limit employee entitlements on termination of employment. In the absence of an enforceable…
In another twist in the rapidly developing area of family status discrimination law, the Federal Court of Appeal recently released…
The recent admission of a large number of new health professions to those recognized in the Ontario Regulated Health Professions Act,…
Bill 148, the Fair Workplaces, Better Jobs Act, passed its third and final reading today. With Liberal and NDP MPPs…
Supreme Court Allows Employees to “Double-Up” on Pregnancy and Parental Benefits A regular point of contention between unions and employers…
Landon Young discusses how to avoid the fixed term contract trap.
Jeremy Schwartz discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision that upheld a landmark retroactive loss of earnings award from…
An office holiday party is a great time to unwind as a team and encourage a sense of community. Unfortunately,…
In 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v Figliola (“Figliola”). The Figliola decision addressed the…
Summary judgment has increasingly become a process used to litigate wrongful dismissal actions. It can be attractive as it allows…
Jessica Young discusses a recent record setting human rights damages award.
Ryan Conlin and Frank Portman discuss the disturbing trend of increasingly large general damages awards in human rights litigation.
Don’t Read This Article. Post the New Employment Standards Act Poster!
By: Jeremy D. Schwartz and Frank B. Portman The recent Supreme Court decision in Sattva Capital Corp v Creston Moly Corp …
The calendar has now changed over to 2015, and with the New Year comes an interesting legal situation for certain…