The legalization of marijuana for recreational use will have a profound impact on workplaces across the country. This Webinar examines the legal challenges that Canadian organizations will face in responding to this new reality.
Accident Investigationsand Compliance AuditsCorporate ImmigrationHuman RightsOccupational Health and SafetyPolicy DevelopmentReview
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
“Creative Sentencing” for Corporations Convicted of OH&S Offences Arrives in Ontario
By: Ryan Conlin and Jeremy Schwartz An Ontario Court may have altered the legal landscape with respect to sentencing corporations…
10 Feb 2020
Judge Imposes Jail Time on Metron Construction Site Supervisor
Those involved with occupational health and safety law have followed with interest the ongoing saga of Metron Construction. This sad…
13 Jan 2016
What you Need to Know About the New Voluntary Workplace Mental Health Standard
The Psychological Health and Safety in the Workplace – Prevention, promotion and guidance to staged implementation (the “Standard”) was released by the…
04 Jun 2013
Supreme Court Decision May Protect Defendants Charged with OHSA Offences from Unreasonable Delay
Corporate employers who are faced with charges under the Occupational Health and Safety Act or other legislation occupy a curious position when…
14 Sep 2016
Long and Winding Road Managing Emerging Employment and OHS Issues in the COVID Transition
Employers have made their plans; they’ve hunkered down; and they’ve sheltered in place. As we traverse the long and winding…
11 Dec 2020
Blame the Lawyer? Drawing Best Practices for In-House Counsel from the Jurisprudence
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Amanda Boyce In-house counsel is often the unsung hero of a legal saga, having guided their…
14 Sep 2016
Think You Suffered Family Status Discrimination? First Things First – Were You Employed in Ontario or B.C.?
The law governing family status discrimination under human rights legislation is unsettled and varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. A new…
16 Apr 2019
Preferential Treatment for Employees with Active WSIB Claims not Discriminatory
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the “Tribunal”) recently held that it is not discriminatory for employers to treat disabled…
25 Oct 2017
Human Rights Tribunal Discourages Unnecessary Naming of Personal Respondents in Applications
In Sterling v Wendy’s Restaurant, the applicants (a former Wendy’s employee and his wife), named 14 personal respondents, who were members…
07 Sep 2011
WSIB RETURN TO WORK DECISIONS: ARE THEY BINDING ON THE HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL?
The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human…
14 Sep 2010
Court of Appeal More Than Triples the Fine for Christmas Eve Swing Stage Collapse – Ryan Conlin
By: Ryan J. Conlin The Ontario Court of Appeal has sent a clear message that employers convicted of criminal negligence can expect…
06 Sep 2013
Fail to Plan? Plan to Fail. Pandemic Planning and Response for HR
The World Health Organization has declared COVID-19 a global pandemic. Not since H1N1 and SARS before that, have employers faced…
27 Mar 2020
Immigration status by any other name?
By Amanda Boyce and Haadi Malik In 2019, we wrote about the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the “Tribunal”) decision in Haseeb v Imperial Oil Limited,…
13 Jul 2021
Court Confirms Signaling Does Not Have to Be a Worker’s Only Job
A critical element of the health and safety regime in any workplace that employs heavy machinery is the presence of…
07 May 2018
Court of Appeal Rules on Employers’ Obligations to Protect Employees from Harassment and Violence when they are Away from the Workplace
In a recent decision, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld a lower court’s ruling that a citizen’s harassing behaviour toward…
19 Sep 2017