Significant Changes to the Human Rights Tribunal’s Rules – Kelly McDermott and Jeremy Schwartz
Related Posts
The claim was filed 28 years ago by female employees of Canada Post with the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (the…
Since the Supreme Court decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola (“Figliola”), the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the…
The Alberta Court of Queen’s bench recently reviewed the arbitrator’s decision in SMS Equipment, a case on which we have written before (see…
Employers are still wrestling with the consequences of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision on the random drug and alcohol testing…
Even as the world grapples with variants and what appears to be the fourth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, employers…
In the wake of the Divisional Court’s decision in the Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board v Fair, human rights damages have been…
Register Now! As always, our goal is to provide a concise, high-level summary of the most significant legal developments affecting…
In 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v Figliola (“Figliola”). The Figliola decision addressed the…
Canadian employers have been confronted with a veritable ocean of new government programs, which are designed to help weather the…
Ryan Conlin and Frank Portman discuss the disturbing trend of increasingly large general damages awards in human rights litigation.
In a past Stringer Update, Releases Protect Employers from Human Rights Complaints, we emphasized the importance of having terminated employees sign…
By: Ryan Conlin & Frank Portman In most jurisdictions in Canada, human rights legislation prohibits discrimination on the basis of…
Ryan Conlin of Stringer LLP discusses recent jurisprudence concerning random drug and alcohol testing in Canada (post-Irving).
Allison Taylor discusses recent decisions from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario suggesting a disturbing trend in that tribunal permitting…
A recent Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario decision confirms that family status protection may require employers to accommodate employees’ sporadic…

