Employers Not Liable for Tort of Negligent Investigation – But… – Jeffrey Murray and Jeremy Schwartz
Related Posts
Ryan Conlin and Frank Portman discuss the disturbing trend of increasingly large general damages awards in human rights litigation.
In a recent decision, the Alberta Court of Appeal strongly affirmed employers’ right to terminate employees without cause, and without…
Canadian employees are presumptively entitled to “reasonable notice” of termination. Although this entitlement can be limited to some extent by…
The Ontario Superior Court recently recognized a new tort that would allow employees to sue their employers for harassment in…
Notwithstanding the best wishes of employers, there are times when employees have to be let go for purely financial reasons. …
When is a single, serious instance of misconduct just cause for termination, particularly for a long-service employee? In Fernandes v. Peel…
The government of Quebec has recently introduced new incentives for businesses to promote work-life balance, through its “work-family balance certification”…
Allison discusses the difference between a valid and invalid resignation
In a past Stringer Update, Releases Protect Employers from Human Rights Complaints, we emphasized the importance of having terminated employees sign…
Courts Refuse to Restrain Former Salesperson from Competing – Greg McGinnis and Jeremy Schwartz
In the second quarter of 2014, the Ministry of Labour conducted an enforcement “blitz,” targeting companies in several sectors with intern…
By: Jeremy D. Schwartz and Frank B. Portman The recent Supreme Court decision in Sattva Capital Corp v Creston Moly Corp …
Responding to Human Rights Harassment Complaints: Guidelines from the HRTO – Jeremy Schwartz
Landon Young provides draws on recent, wrongful dismissal caselaw to provide guidance to employers considering whether to terminate an employee…
Employers are often told by their lawyers that satisfying a Court that there is “just cause” to terminate an employee…