Employers who only provide the minimum amounts required by employment standards legislation after termination are gambling. Sometimes this approach can result in cost savings, but it can also end in a costly damages and legal costs award as occurred in the case of Brito v. Canac Kitchens. Read our Latest Update for more information about the case, and what to do to protect your organization from such awards.
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Unionizing Foodora: Adapting Labour Law to the Gig Economy
The Ontario Labour Relations Board (the “Board”) has issued a landmark decision which clears the path for Foodora couriers to…
28 Feb 2020
Fail to Plan? Plan to Fail. Pandemic Planning and Response for HR
The World Health Organization has declared COVID-19 a global pandemic. Not since H1N1 and SARS before that, have employers faced…
27 Mar 2020
Ontario Court Confirms that Unwanted Management is not a Constructive Dismissal
An increasingly common theme in wrongful dismissal actions are employee claims that an employer’s allegedly heavy-handed and insensitive management constitutes…
05 Nov 2018
Employer’s Just Cause Assertion Backfires, Results in $1,000,000 in Liability
Ontario’s Court of Appeal recently upheld a trial decision in which an employer’s tactical pursuit of a just cause defence…
28 Feb 2019
Court Precludes Terminated Employee from Relying on Employer’s Apology
In April of 2009, a little known law called the Apology Act (the “Act”) entered into force. A very short act, it primarily…
17 Sep 2015
Termination Clauses: Clearly Restrictive Language Necessary for Enforceability
The Alberta Court of Appeal recently upheld a trial decision that struck a termination clause down as unenforceable. The Facts…
15 Feb 2018
Failure to Mitigate proves Costly to Plaintiff in Constructive Dismissal
In a recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal, Chevalier v. Active Tire & Auto Centre Inc., an employee with 33…
24 Sep 2013
Alberta court rules on the limits of good faith in the performance of employment contracts
In a recent decision, the Alberta Court of Appeal strongly affirmed employers’ right to terminate employees without cause, and without…
31 Jan 2017
2020Q1 Complimentary Quarterly HR-Law Webinar
During this edition of Stringer LLP’s complimentary Quarterly HR-Law Webinar series, broadcast on Monday, January 20, 2020, Ryan Conlin, Jeremy Schwartz and Erika Montisano discussed…
20 Jan 2020
2014 Q1 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 4: Employment Class Action Update
Landon Young discusses a recent wrongful dismissal class action lawsuit and the potential impact on employment litigation
22 Apr 2014
Divisional Court Quashes WSIAT Stress Decision and Allows Constructive Dismissal Case to Proceed
By: Ryan J. Conlin and Jeremy D. Schwartz Historically, workers’ compensation law placed a highly restrictive definition on traumatic mental…
17 Sep 2021
New Year’s Hangover: The Curious Case of the 27 Paycheque Year
The calendar has now changed over to 2015, and with the New Year comes an interesting legal situation for certain…
07 Jan 2015
If it Looks Like Theft and Quacks Like Theft…the Employer may Still pay
While employee theft is frequently grounds for termination, shades of grey do appear in the case law. In a recent…
09 Sep 2014
Constructively Dismissed Employee Entitled to Bonus Despite Plan Language?
By: Landon Young There have been a number of cases in recent years considering whether dismissed employees are entitled to awards…
03 Nov 2020
Honesty is the best policy – Court of Appeal upholds dishonest employee’s dismissal for just cause
Employers are often faced with the galling choice between asserting just cause for termination, and paying potentially large sums of…
19 Jun 2017