Ryan Conlin of Stringer LLP discusses recent jurisprudence concerning random drug and alcohol testing in Canada (post-Irving).
Related Posts
In OPSEU v. Ontario et. al., Ontario’s Divisional Court recently upheld an arbitrator’s ruling to dismiss 22 (grouped) grievances over fault-based…
A recent decision, R v The Corporation of the City of Guelph et al.[1] provides a narrow interpretation of limitation periods in…
As part of the Bill 168 amendments to the Occupational Health and Safety Act (“OHSA”), workers can initiate a work refusal where…
When employees allege harassment in human rights complaints, they often refer to the creation of a “poisoned work environment.” A…
The AODA Employment Standard deadlines are not as far away as they may seem. The Employment Standard is one of…
By: Ryan Conlin & Frank Portman A recent case from Ontario’s Human Rights Tribunal is a stark reminder of how…
In the wake of the Divisional Court’s decision in the Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board v Fair, human rights damages have been…
In a decision that will come as little surprise to many labour practitioners, on both sides on the union-management spectrum,…
The Ontario Labour Relations Board (OLRB) has ruled that a worker does not have to be a certified or apprentice…
This is segment 4 of 5 from our Q3 webinar held on Thursday, October 10, “Implications of the Ontario Court of Appeal…
Facts On one unfortunate day in July 2017, a 15-year-old boy drowned while swimming in a lake on a school…
It may seem fairly obvious when a worker breaks her leg “in the course of employment”. However, injuries and illnesses…
A revised Bill 160 was passed on June 1st. Notable changes to the Bill include an increase in the role…
In British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola, a decision released in October 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada found that…
Do you have a policy prohibiting your employees from smoking when they drive alone in a company vehicle? If not,…