The Ontario Superior Court has ruled that an employee who continued to work for 15 months following a change in his terms and conditions of employment had not condoned the change and could claim damages for constructive dismissal. Read more about this surprising decision and key lessons for employers to learn in our Latest Update.
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
No Bonus Entitlement – “Active Employment” Requirement did not Violate ESA
The Ontario Court of Appeal recently denied entitlement to bonus payout to an employee who quit his job. The Court…
04 Dec 2017
2016 Q2 HR-Law Webinar Part 5: ONCA on General Damages
Frank Portman discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision which greatly increased the scope of general and other damages…
19 Jul 2016
Pay in Lieu of Notice by Salary Continuance Deemed Implicit Right
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently ruled in Bowes v. Goss Power Products Ltd., that a fairly standard termination provision…
29 Sep 2011
Appeal Court Finds Compensation for Loss During Notice Period Trumps Shareholders’ Agreement
A recent decision by the British Columbia Court of Appeal highlights the importance of carefully crafting written employment agreements whenever shares are…
11 Jul 2013
Recent Amendments to Rule 76 Simplified Procedure
Recent amendments to Rule 76 of the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure will help to reduce legal costs and streamline the litigation…
29 Jan 2020
Minimizing Mitigation: Court of Appeal gives employee benefit of the doubt
A recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision dealt a blow to employers’ ability to credit employee mitigation efforts and income…
07 Jul 2017
Alleged Multi-Million Dollar Employee Benefits Fraud at Baycrest Hospital
Ryan Conlin quoted in the National Post and speaks with CTV News and 610 CKTB Radio re Multi-million dollar employee benefits fraud allegedly involving 150 Baycrest…
11 Jul 2019
Mitigation – A duty to act in your own professional interest
When no work is available in a particular field, dismissed employees may undertake reasonable mitigation efforts by pursuing re-training to…
30 Dec 2016
Alberta court rules on the limits of good faith in the performance of employment contracts
In a recent decision, the Alberta Court of Appeal strongly affirmed employers’ right to terminate employees without cause, and without…
31 Jan 2017
2014 Q3 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 4: AODA Enforcement Update
Jessica Young discusses recent enforcement activities under the new Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA)
14 Oct 2014
Supreme Court to Review Definition of “Unjust” Dismissals for Federal Employers
In February, we wrote about a decision by the Federal Court of Appeal in Wilson v Atomic Energy Limited (see our earlier…
23 Jul 2015
Putting on the Brakes: The Limits of the Common Employer Doctrine
One of the more deceptively complex questions in some cases can be: Who is the employer? Many businesses and organizations…
10 Jun 2016
ONCA Upholds Brito but Quashes Punitive Award
The Ontario Court of Appeal has released its concise decision in Brito v. Canac Kitchens, in which the court upheld a…
08 Feb 2012
201701 Quarterly HR Law Webinar 01: Use of Discipline Records for Just Cause
Frank discusses how to best ensure you may rely on disciplinary records to prove just cause
11 Sep 2021
Off-Duty Drunk Driving Not Just Cause for Termination – Even for a Firefighter
In Klonteig v West Kelowna (District), the British Columbia Superior Court found that an employer that terminated a firefighter for driving…
27 Jun 2018