The Ontario Superior Court has ruled that an employee who continued to work for 15 months following a change in his terms and conditions of employment had not condoned the change and could claim damages for constructive dismissal. Read more about this surprising decision and key lessons for employers to learn in our Latest Update.
Related Posts
Don’t Read This Article. Post the New Employment Standards Act Poster!
The recent admission of a large number of new health professions to those recognized in the Ontario Regulated Health Professions Act,…
This is segment 3 of 5 from our Q3 webinar held on Thursday, October 10, “Breach of Confidentiality Clauses in Settlements”
By: Ryan J. Conlin and Jeremy D. Schwartz Historically, workers’ compensation law placed a highly restrictive definition on traumatic mental…
Ryan Conlin and Jeremy Schwartz discuss Bill 146 and the potential impact on employers.
Employers who only provide the minimum amounts required by employment standards legislation after termination are gambling. Sometimes this approach can…
As we roll into December, many employers will be hosting an office holiday party for their employees. While these events…
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the “Tribunal”) recently awarded $101,363.16, representing four years’ lost salary, and $15,000.00 for injury to dignity,…
Amanda discusses the law on bonus eligibility during the reasonable notice period
How do you know when an employee has quit her job? It may seem like a simple question, but the…
An office holiday party is a great time to unwind as a team and encourage a sense of community. Unfortunately,…
Frank Portman discusses a recent case in which the Ontario Court of Appeal reversed a trial decision and substituted a…
The Ontario Court of Appeal has released its concise decision in Brito v. Canac Kitchens, in which the court upheld a…
Navigating the intricate legal environment of a merger, acquisition, takeover or other corporate restructuring can be difficult enough without the…
Ontario’s Court of Appeal recently upheld a trial decision in which an employer’s tactical pursuit of a just cause defence…