The Ontario Superior Court has ruled that an employee who continued to work for 15 months following a change in his terms and conditions of employment had not condoned the change and could claim damages for constructive dismissal. Read more about this surprising decision and key lessons for employers to learn in our Latest Update.
Related Posts
The law in Canada regarding random drug and alcohol testing has been inconsistent for some time, with the Alberta and…
Ontario Court of Appeal Rules Non-Competition Clause Unenforceable – Allison Taylor
By: Landon Young and Jessica Young Does a terminated employee have a duty to accept an offer of re-employment after termination? This issue…
Jeff Murray discusses social host liability for employers.
As work patterns change in the modern era, the line between independent contractor and employee can often become blurry. A…
Landon Young discusses how to avoid the fixed term contract trap.
Disability management is a challenging issue for HR professionals. An employee with a disability may require an extended absence from…
This is segment 1 of 5 from our Q3 webinar held on Thursday, October 10, “Upcoming AODA Obligations – What You Need…
In this webinar, Ryan Conlin and Landon Young provided guidance for employers on how to respond to the legal challenges…
By: Ryan J. Conlin and Jeremy D. Schwartz Historically, workers’ compensation law placed a highly restrictive definition on traumatic mental…
The Ontario Superior Court recently found that an employee had been constructively dismissed when her employer reneged on its promise…
To be enforceable, non-competition agreements must, as a general rule, be reasonable and unambiguous in terms of their geographic scope,…
Corporate restructuring is often accompanied by lawsuits by jilted employees claiming constructive dismissal. In a recent case, the Ontario Court…
In a recent blog, we discussed the trend toward the use of summary judgement motions to resolve wrongful dismissal actions. By…
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has refused to permit a group of former Allstate Insurance employees to sue Allstate…

