WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin
Related Posts
Tweet This Post Posted on Wednesday, July 6th, 2011 at 11:24 am Categories: Uncategorized.
On September 4, 2020, Ryan and Jeremy discussed the legal tightrope in terms of employee attendance management, that employers must…
Most employers are likely familiar with the WSIB return to work process which often involves a WSIB employee attending at…
In a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, the Court dealt with the issue of awarding legal costs…
Discrimination Case Reversed by the Courts: Are we Entering a New Era? – Allison Taylor
Ryan Conlin and Frank Portman discuss the disturbing trend of increasingly large general damages awards in human rights litigation.
Date: Dec 06, 2021 Vaccine mandates have been legally and politically controversial in Canada and around the world. We are…
Frank Portman discusses a recent, significant decision from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario concerning remedies and mental illness in…
The AODA Employment Standard deadlines are not as far away as they may seem. The Employment Standard is one of…
Jessica Young explains the inherent risks associated with “encouraging” employees to retire.
In a past Stringer Update, Releases Protect Employers from Human Rights Complaints, we emphasized the importance of having terminated employees sign…
When is an owner also an “employee”? The Supreme Court of Canada recently rendered a decision on the question of…
Ryan Conlin of Stringer LLP discusses recent jurisprudence concerning random drug and alcohol testing in Canada (post-Irving).
Allison Taylor discusses progressive discipline and termination for employee misconduct.
The law on addiction has evolved over the years in arbitral jurisprudence. Earlier decisions treated illness as a mitigating factor…