Employers who only provide the minimum amounts required by employment standards legislation after termination are gambling. Sometimes this approach can result in cost savings, but it can also end in a costly damages and legal costs award as occurred in the case of Brito v. Canac Kitchens. Read our Latest Update for more information about the case, and what to do to protect your organization from such awards.
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
The Enemy Within: Protecting Your Business and Confidential Information from Departing Employees
Don’t miss our May 16 Webinar:
11 Apr 2011
Ontario Court of Appeal Rules Non-Competition Clause Unenforceable – Allison Taylor
Ontario Court of Appeal Rules Non-Competition Clause Unenforceable – Allison Taylor
12 May 2011
“Uncommon” employers – Corporate Structure vs Employment Obligations
When an employer terminates an employee without just cause in Ontario, it must either provide reasonable notice of the termination,…
11 Jan 2017
Employees in fiduciary relationships may be entitled to bonuses even upon breach of duties
A recent decision, the Court of Appeal, Mady Development Corp. v. Rossetto, clarified an employee’s entitlement to bonuses who has breached…
14 Feb 2012
Consideration: What’s Good for the Goose is Good for the Gander
In a unique set of circumstances, the Ontario Superior Court recently found that changes to an employment contract which benefited…
31 Jan 2018
Announcing our Complimentary Quarterly HR-Law Webinar (Q2)
Our first quarterly, HR-Law Webinar was a great success, with over 150 registrants. Thank you to those who joined us…
17 Jun 2013
Court Rules no Class Action for Constructive Dismissal
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has refused to permit a group of former Allstate Insurance employees to sue Allstate…
29 Apr 2011
Recent Amendments to Rule 76 Simplified Procedure
Recent amendments to Rule 76 of the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure will help to reduce legal costs and streamline the litigation…
29 Jan 2020
2015 Q1 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 3: Social Media in the Workplace
Jeremy Schwartz compares the results of two termination grievances arising out of racist and misogynistic tweets.
21 Apr 2015
What mental capacity is required to sign a release?
In a past Stringer Update, Releases Protect Employers from Human Rights Complaints, we emphasized the importance of having terminated employees sign…
11 Oct 2012
201701 Quarterly HR Law Webinar 04: Handling Employee Resignations
Allison discusses the difference between a valid and invalid resignation
24 Jan 2017
Does Human Rights Legislation Apply to Job Ads on Facebook?
Technological advancements frequently outpace the law’s ability to respond to the challenges they create. With the click of a button,…
12 Apr 2019
Addiction without compulsion: no defence to serious misconduct using the “hybrid” approach
The law on addiction has evolved over the years in arbitral jurisprudence. Earlier decisions treated illness as a mitigating factor…
03 Mar 2017
Court of Appeal upholds decision granting employee notice period based on employment with predecessors
We have previously written on the decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Danbury v 1416088 Ontario Ltd (see our…
15 May 2015
Termination Clauses: Clearly Restrictive Language Necessary for Enforceability
The Alberta Court of Appeal recently upheld a trial decision that struck a termination clause down as unenforceable. The Facts…
15 Feb 2018