Ryan Conlin and Jeremy Schwartz discuss Bill 146 and the potential impact on employers.
Related Posts
Ryan Conlin of Stringer LLP discusses recent jurisprudence concerning random drug and alcohol testing in Canada (post-Irving).
In a recent Court of Appeal Decision, Elsegood v Cambridge Spring Services, the Court awarded common law damages to an employee…
Metron Construction has been fined $200,000 following a guilty plea to a charge of criminal charge negligence causing death in…
By: Landon Young and Jessica Young Does a terminated employee have a duty to accept an offer of re-employment after termination? This issue…
Jeremy Schwartz compares the results of two termination grievances arising out of racist and misogynistic tweets.
A revised Bill 160 was passed on June 1st. Notable changes to the Bill include an increase in the role…
This is segment 2 of 5 from our Q3 webinar held on Thursday, October 10, “Recent Developments in Summary Judgement Motions”
In Lancia v. Park Dentistry, the Ontario Superior Court confirmed that employers can change the fundamental terms of an employee’s employment,…
Jeff Murray discusses a recent Alberta Court of Queens Bench decision that overturned an arbitration panel’s finding that Suncor’s random…
Employers that decide to implement a profit sharing plan for employees should make sure that the terms of the plan…
Ryan Conlin discusses the potentially watershed decision in R. v. Roofing Medics, in which the court commented that more personal…
The U.S. Labour Department has recently commenced an initiative to require employers to prepare and adopt compliance plans to ensure…
Frank Portman discusses a recent case in which the Ontario Court of Appeal reversed a trial decision and substituted a…
A recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision serves to remind employers that the presumption of provincial jurisdiction over labour relations…
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Amanda Boyce In-house counsel is often the unsung hero of a legal saga, having guided their…

